Yes, but...

[daemonluna]

The good news--getting new glasses! The bad news is that my opthamologist retired, and his replacement is only taking on patients from him that he'd seen in the past two years. They insist I haven't been in since 1994, which doesn't explain the prescription from 2000 that I've got here...

Which means that this afternoon, I'm going to an optometrist I've never been to. Which means that they want to dilate my eyes. I hate-hate-hate those damn drops with a passion. Last time, it took a day and a half for my eyes to go back to normal. I can't READ if I can't focus my eyes. (The good news being that it sounds like next time they check my eyes, they won't need to dilate them.)

But! New glasses!

Comments

[daemonluna.livejournal.com]

Huh, strange--I was at the optometrist, not the opthamologist, this time. However, he did say that the ones they used to photograph the inside of your eyeball aren't as harsh as the ones they use to determine a new prescription, which might explain it.

[starplex.livejournal.com]

Interesting! I went googling on this, and found that optometrists have been lobbying for the right to administer the dilating eye drops, and in many jurisdictions can, in fact, do it now; I don't think they can, though, in Ontario, where I live.